I work alongside you to structure, compare and secure your energy decisions — from initial concept through project handover.
Alongside an engineering firm or contractor, I intervene transversally across your projects — from the very first questions through to final handover.
Before commissioning a costly study (typically €5,000 to €15,000), I carry out a rapid mapping of your asset portfolio. Within a few days, you know which buildings to prioritise and what budget to allocate — staying fully in control of your investment.
Targeted assignments, a clear scope, a precise deliverable, a fixed fee. No commercial interest with any contractor, manufacturer or technology.
The energy performance of warehouses can be optimised. ROI, EEC, CRREM — every lever is identified and quantified.
Learn more ->Rapid qualification of an asset portfolio to identify energy and financial priorities. Within 5 to 10 days, you know where to invest first.
Request a mapping ->Comparative analysis of solutions, quantified over 30 years, for an unbiased technical verdict.
Read the HVAC guide ->Updating forecast expenditure items and activating financial levers: grants, EEC bonuses, tenant energy rent and energy levers.
Discuss it ->I translate energy complexity into decision-ready language. A neutral point of contact, with no conflict of interest, for clearer understanding.
Discuss it ->Relevance analysis of heat pump solutions. Quantified comparison in a real context, in collaboration with specialist engineering firms (thermal, fluids, ground survey…).
Geothermal analysis ->Energy masterplans are expensive and time-consuming. Deciding without them means investing blind. There is a third way.
In 3 to 5 days, I qualify your asset portfolio and identify — in priority order — where to focus effort and budget.
I am neither a supplier, nor an installer, nor a software publisher. My sole interest: that your decision is the right one.
Whether on a warehouse geothermal project or otherwise, my advice is 100% independent, without bias.
SCOP, SEER, kW capacity, technical literacy: energy technology is complex. Making it readable for decision-makers is a skill in itself.
At feasibility stage, during bid review, or as a concise assessment — all options are available. Let's not wait until construction to realise that decisions were suboptimal and could cost up to 3× more to correct.
Each scenario is evaluated against the same indicators: real ROI, impact on asset value, confirmed benefit for the occupier, and post-project communication.
Direct answers, no jargon.
Another question? ->Available to discuss your project — response within 48 hours!